Innovation or regulation – which changes business most?

July 19th, 2011 by: Chris Evans

I have been writing for the IFC Review for almost a year now on the subject of cloud computing and what the benefits and risks are to offshore financial services professionals in terms of data security and storage.  I made the point that the commercial opportunities available from emerging technology are often exploited by business before the regulators have had time to determine the implications and address the need for new legislation and regulation.   In other words, that they are continually playing catch up.

Looking again at the published article (Whatever happened to business as usual?) I noticed there was another article under the technology section and was interested to read the following:

“It’s pretty clear that financial regulation is driving data best practices across the industry. The bottom line is that the risks have never been higher, and you can’t afford not to be able to produce the myriad sets of data potentially required by a host of new regulations and regulators….” Fierce Finance IT reports.

That may at first seem like a contradiction – stating that financial regulation is driving data best practices across the industry but I think that’s right.  Innovation is driving new practices and regulation follows modifying new practices to best practices.

If we accept that regulation will always follow behind the consequences of innovation and that the rate of innovation is going to continue to accelerate how will the regulators avoid being increasingly left behind?

Any ideas? Please write in the comment box below, thanks.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • RSS

Chris Evans Wins Global Director Award

June 13th, 2011 by: Marketing

Chris Evans and Michael Portillo

 

This Friday saw the annual Jersey Institute of Directors Awards at the Hotel De France. The room was entertained by the former politician, Michael Portillo, who gave the benefit of his considerable experience in European economics.  When it came to the awards section of the evening Foreshore’s Chris Evans won the Global Director of the Year Award. The IOD state that

“This award is for an individual who has successfully promoted Jersey and their organisation overseas, enhancing Jersey’s international reputation.  It places the work of local directors in a wider content and recognises that the work of directors often goes beyond business performance and extends into the realm of acting as an ambassador for the Island.”

In addition to this Chris was singled out as;

“An entrepreneur who, having established the business, identified new income streams and has grown overseas revenue from almost nothing to 40% in a short time.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • RSS

Top 3 Highlights Of The DataCentres 2011 Event

May 26th, 2011 by: Derek Fage

DataCentres 2011 is Europe’s premier enterprise datacentre and cloud content event and with more than 85 expert speakers there were plenty of highlights, these are our top three.

1.The emergence of the two metrics to increase efficiency were proposed by the Green Grid.  These metrics are to complement the Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) measurement that has been used by datacentres in the past. The metrics proposed were;

  • Carbon Usage Effectiveness (CUE) metric which addresses the carbon emissions associated with the generation of power for the operation of datacentres and,
  • Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE) metric enables datacentre operators to quickly address the water sustainability aspect of their datacentres.

These show that the datacentre industry is really starting to pay attention to efficiency as the initial white papers are reviewed and commented on.  To download the white papers or get more information on the various metrics, see http://www.thegreengrid.org

2.The session on cooling architectures presented by Dr Robert Tozer who is the Managing Director for Operational Intelligence Ltd was particularly interesting.

The emphasis this year has been on the ability to use free cooling when and where possible.

Using the climatic conditions of your region, reducing the amount of mechanical cooling makes running a datacenter greener and reduces the operational overheads.

This would require some changes in datacentre practices, as temperature and humidity setting will be need to be increased to allow or additional free cooling – especially for the summer months in the Northern Hemisphere.

The most interesting discussion took place around zero refrigeration/no chillers as this was only seen by the session participants as feasible in countries that are have predominately colder climates such as the Scandinavian, Russia and the Northern Canadian regions. Although this led to some debate the discussion focused on the fact that many countries in Europe could utilise this technology in conjunction with more traditional technologies for the warmer months. Its will be exciting to see how this will impact the design and build of Northern Hemisphere datacenters.

3. Fred Beringer from SOASTA shared how the elastic scalability of clouds such as the Amazon EC2 can be used to improve load testing and get real time analytic results. Fred has cut the need for cumbersome testing that involved extensive configuration and reduced the time it has taken to receive the results.  This has increased the ability to react quickly and scale back testing as soon as any adverse impacts become apparent.  The way they are using the cloud to increase efficiency is game changing.   It’s a great example of how using the elasticity and on-demand aspect of the cloud can be used as an advantage for businesses.  For more check out the SOASTA website

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • RSS

Guide To The US Gaming Charges

May 19th, 2011 by: Andrew Jarrett

4 gaming operators are facing various criminal charges from the USA for unlawful internet gambling enforcement act 2006, violating the illegal gambling business act, bank wire fraud and money laundering.  The US Justice Department has focussed on PokerStars, Full Tilt, Absolute Poker and Ultimate Bet with the intention of cutting them out of the market to stop online gaming by US citizens.

Impact On The Players

  • US players will not stop gambling, they will move to less reputable organisations based in locations that are not regulated
  • In these locations players will not have the protection of fair games and are unlikely to be playing with socially responsible operators.
  • US poker players with funds on deposit are unlikely to get that money out.
  • Professional poker player sponsorship deals are drying up and the tournaments they play in and TV shows are being cancelled.
  • Professional players will leave online and go land-based while they work out what to do next.

Impact On The Operators

  • There is likely to be a boom in operators based in unregulated locations.
  • European operators will benefit as the American marketing funds dry up and they will now be able to compete on a level playing field.
  • The IOM and Alderney have operators licensed there whether or not the dirt will stick it’s too early to tell.
  • If the major operators are victorious Congress will have to listen to and  regulate resulting in a flood of new operators

The key points of the case against the operators

  • The justice department did not allege a violation of wire tapping act 1961
  • The Illegal gambling business act requires breaking of State Law in order to trigger violation of federal law – this could be a pivotal issue.
  • The bank wire act charge is tricky – it will be very interesting to see how justice department can bring allegations to the banks which were “tricked into making millions of dollars.”
  • They are asking to confiscate $3bn from 75 bank accounts as proceeds of illegal activity.
  • Gambling allegations require the prosecutor to show that the operator violates New York State gambling law, and that states that for a criminal charge to take place chance has to predominate over skill.  Meaning that a skill game is not gambling. Therefore, the prosecutor has to prove operators violated New York State statue – which maybe very difficult.

What does this all mean?

The criminal charges are forcing a massive change in the industry, there is a risk that the Justice Department will not only fail in their endeavours to make online gaming illegal but push players to unregulated jurisdictions filled with questionable operators potentially resulting in less of a paper trail and more chance for fraud and money laundering.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • RSS

4 Reasons Why Your Business Should Use Hosted Exchange

May 4th, 2011 by: Andrew Jarrett

A growing number of companies are recognising the benefits of partnering with a technology provider to host their Exchange server needs and there are several good reasons for doing so.  Here are our four reasons why you should use a hosted exchange for your business. Read more…

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • RSS